GitHub's Copilot code review update gives organizations more control over how review runs, which runners it uses, and which files it can see. That is useful, but it also means platform teams need a rollout plan before they widen usage.
The key question is not whether the settings exist. The key question is whether the team has a policy for defaults, exceptions, and the owners who approve those exceptions.
Checklist
- Runner type: Decide which runner class is the default.
- Locking: Define when org-level defaults override repository settings.
- Content exclusions: List paths that should be out of review scope.
- Instructions: Review large instruction files as governed assets.
Bottom Line
Use the new controls to make review behavior predictable. Copilot code review is most effective when the organization has already decided what good enough looks like, who can change policy, and how that change is recorded.