Home / Blog / Estimating Fable and Sol model sizes
Tech News

Estimating Fable and Sol model sizes

I'll pull the linked source so the paragraphs stay grounded in what was actually claimed about Fable and Sol sizes.Researcher **@anpaure** published…

By Dillip Chowdary • Aug 04, 2026 • Source: HN Claude/Codex/Fable

Estimating Fable and Sol model sizes

I'll pull the linked source so the paragraphs stay grounded in what was actually claimed about Fable and Sol sizes.Researcher **@anpaure** published **Frontier model size estimates**, an interactive chart of implied total parameters for current frontier models, and shared it on X. On Hacker News the link sat at **7 points** with **0 comments**. The two headline figures are **Claude Fable 5** at a **model estimate of 4.5T** parameters and **GPT-5.6 Sol** at **3.1T**.

The page does not treat those numbers as single opaque guesses. It combines audited capability signals from the **Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index** and the **Epoch Capabilities Index**, uses **No-CoT Time Horizon** as the primary parameter-scaling branch, and treats API price and compute as lower-weight checks. For **Fable** and **Sol** specifically, the **public estimate** is the **geometric mean** of parameter-count forecasts from a **20-person poll** of researchers and engineers. The forest plot shows a wider **weighted factor range** for Fable (**3.2–6.6T**, public estimate **4.4T**) than for Sol (**2.9–3.4T**, public estimate **3.2T**), so Sol’s band is tighter around its point estimate.

Advertisement

Tech Pulse Daily

Get tomorrow's pulse first

Join engineers who read Tech Pulse before stand-up. Free, weekday mornings.

For engineers building on **Claude** and **Codex**, parameter scale is a proxy for latency, cost, and when a smaller tier is enough. If Sol is ~**3.1T** and Fable ~**4.5T**, routing, caching, and agent budgets should not treat the two flagships as interchangeable black boxes. The poll-plus-evidence method is reproducible: you can reweight channels and see which inputs move the estimate.

On the same scale, **Claude Opus 5** sits at **3.0T**, disclosed **Kimi K3** at **2.8T**, **Claude Opus 4.8** at **2.7T**, **GPT-5.5** at **2.3T**, **GPT-5.6 Terra** at **2.1T**, **Claude Sonnet 5** at **1.6T**, and both **Grok 4.5** (disclosed) and **GPT-5.6 Luna** at **1.5T**. That puts Fable above the rest of the chart and Sol roughly in the Opus 5 / Kimi K3 band, with OpenAI’s family clearly tiered (**Sol > Terra > Luna**).

Treat the numbers as estimates, not vendor specs. Watch the **repo** and chart for poll updates, factor reweights, and any official disclosures that pin Fable or Sol the way **Kimi K3** and **Grok 4.5** already are.

Advertisement

🔎 More interesting news

5-min tech signal

Weekday briefing for engineers who skip the noise.

No spam · Unsubscribe anytime

Advertisement

✈️ CareerPilot

Your AI job-search copilot

Match your resume against live Ashby, Greenhouse & Lever openings — fit scores, job-specific resume optimization and email alerts.

Find matching jobs →

Free Tools

Browse all tools →