AI models flub these intelligence tests. Can you fare any better?
Puzzles and games have been central to AI development since the very beginning. AI models flub these intelligence tests. Can you fare any better?
By Dillip Chowdary • Aug 31, 2026 • Source: MIT Technology Review
What happened
MIT Technology Review reports: AI models flub these intelligence tests. Can you fare any better?. Puzzles and games have been central to AI development since the very beginning. Just as we humans like to test our smarts with crosswords or logic puzzles, developers can test how far models have advanced with a gaming gauntlet. The term “machine learning” was popularized in a 1959 article by the IBM computer…
Advertisement
Tech Pulse Daily
Get tomorrow's pulse first
Join engineers who read Tech Pulse before stand-up. Free, weekday mornings.
How it works
Read the original coverage at MIT Technology Review via the source link above for the complete details and primary quotes.
Who is affected
Cross-check release notes and official docs before changing production systems based on early reporting.
Developer Action Items
- ☐ Diff the official changelog for IBM before you bump — APIs, defaults, and removed flags only.
- ☐ Install through the vendor's documented channel in staging; keep a one-command rollback and time-box the canary.
- ☐ Grep your repo for old flag names, lockfile pins, and plugin versions that the notes mark as breaking.
- ☐ Prefer the first patch cut over the day-zero tag unless you have a reason to be on the leading edge.
- ☐ If MIT Technology Review did not name a region, plan, or SKU, screenshot the official availability line before you promise it to users.
Advertisement
🔎 More interesting news
- We run five Claude Code sessions at once
- I am no longer letting Claude Code add itself as Co-author in my commits
- Apple reportedly considered launching a new Apple Pencil for iPhone Ultra
- Claude Session URL appended to commit messages and PR descriptions by default
- Today's full Tech Pulse briefing →